Comparison of myopia control treatment options at Eyecare Concepts Melbourne
Comparing The Evidence

Myopia Control Treatments Compared

Several treatments genuinely slow myopia progression. The best one for your child depends on more than just clinical trial percentages.

Home › Myopia › Myopia Control › Treatments Compared

Five Good Options, Not One Best Answer

Families often ask us which myopia control treatment is “the best.” The honest answer is that we offer five treatment options, each with genuine clinical trial evidence behind it, and the differences between the top-performing options are usually smaller than the differences between children.

That's why this page focuses on how each treatment works and what the evidence actually shows, rather than ranking them by a single number. Our Myopia Control page covers the bigger picture of why slowing progression matters, and our Evidence-Based Treatment page covers the research behind our approach in full.

myopia-treatments-02.jpg — Range Of Myopia Control Products On A Table
The Evidence

How The Treatments Compare

Clinical trials consistently group treatments into rough tiers based on how much they slow axial elongation compared with standard correction alone.

OrthoK (Orthokeratology)

Overnight corneal reshaping lenses. Among the most researched myopia control treatments, with trials generally showing around 50% or more reduction in axial elongation. Also corrects vision by day, with nothing worn while awake. Full details on OrthoK.

Myopia Control Contact Lenses (e.g. MiSight)

Daily soft lenses with dual-focus optics, worn during waking hours. Randomised trials of MiSight showed roughly 50% or more reduction in progression over standard soft lens wear. Full details on myopia control contact lenses.

Myopia Control Glasses (MiyoSMART, Stellest)

Everyday spectacle lenses built with specialised optical zones. Trials of MiyoSMART and Stellest have both reported around 50% or greater reduction in progression, making glasses a genuinely effective, low-maintenance option. Full details on myopia control glasses.

Low-Dose Atropine Eye Drops

Nightly eye drops that slow progression pharmacologically. Higher concentrations such as 0.05% have shown effect sizes broadly in line with the lens-based options above; lower concentrations such as 0.01% appear meaningfully less effective. Can be used alone or alongside a lens-based treatment.

Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy (RLRL)

A non-lens treatment using short daily sessions of low-level red light at home, simulating some of the retinal signalling associated with outdoor light exposure. Once considered an early-stage option, it now has a genuinely large evidence base behind it: a 2022 multicentre randomised trial, and more recently a real-world cohort of nearly 2,900 children followed for up to five years, showing effective axial length control sustained across all five years, with some meta-analyses suggesting its effect size may match or exceed atropine and contact lens options. As with any newer treatment, we monitor eye health closely during use, including periodic retinal checks.

Combination Therapy

Pairing a lens-based treatment with low-dose atropine, aiming for additional slowing beyond either treatment alone. An evolving area of evidence, most relevant for children whose progression remains significant on a single treatment.

A Note On Comparing Percentages

Efficacy figures from different clinical trials aren't directly comparable to each other, since study populations, follow-up length and comparison groups all differ. A 60% result in one trial doesn't necessarily beat a 50% result in another. We look at the overall weight of evidence for each treatment, not just the headline number, when forming a recommendation.

myopia-treatments-03.jpg — Optometrist Discussing Treatment Options With Family

How We Choose Between Them

Once we're past the top tier of similarly effective treatments, the decision usually comes down to the individual child rather than the evidence alone: their age, prescription, eye health, sport and activity level, how they'll cope with contact lens handling or overnight lens wear, and what will realistically be worn consistently, since consistency matters as much as the treatment itself.

A treatment a child won't wear reliably isn't the right treatment for them, no matter how strong its trial data looks on paper. That's the clinical reasoning we apply at every myopia control consultation, and why two children with the same prescription can end up on genuinely different plans.

myopia-control-treatment-02.jpg — Myopia Control Consultation Photo
Common Questions

Myopia Control Treatments: FAQs

Which myopia control treatment works best?
Clinical trial evidence groups treatments into tiers rather than one single winner. OrthoK, MiSight contact lenses, and spectacle lenses such as MiyoSMART and Stellest have each shown around 50% or more reduction in axial elongation in trials, broadly comparable to each other. Low-dose atropine (0.05%) sits in a similar range. No single option has been shown to be clearly superior to the others in this top tier.
Can percentage results from different studies be compared directly?
Not reliably. Different trials use different populations, follow-up periods and comparison groups, so a 60% result in one study and a 50% result in another don't necessarily mean the first treatment is genuinely more effective. We weigh the overall evidence base, not just headline percentages, when making recommendations.
Is combination treatment more effective than a single treatment?
For some children, yes. Combining a lens-based treatment with low-dose atropine is an active area of research and can offer additional slowing for children who are still progressing meaningfully on a single treatment. It's not the default starting point for every child, but it's a genuine option when needed.
How do you decide which treatment is right for my child?
We weigh age, current prescription, eye health, lifestyle, sport and activity level, and how comfortable your child is likely to be with contact lenses versus glasses versus overnight lens wear. Two children with an identical prescription can end up on quite different treatments because everything else about them differs.
Is red light therapy an option for myopia control?
Repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy is an emerging treatment with promising early trial results, generally used at home for short daily sessions. It's a newer addition to the evidence base compared with OrthoK, soft lenses and atropine, and we discuss it as an option where appropriate.
How long does myopia control treatment need to continue?
Generally, treatment continues until progression has genuinely stopped, which is confirmed by tracking axial length and prescription over time rather than assumed at a set age. For many, this means treatment through the teenage years, sometimes into early adulthood if progression is still measurable.
Do myopia control treatments have side effects?
Each has its own safety profile. OrthoK and contact lenses carry a small risk of lens-related complications, similar to any contact lens wear, managed through proper fitting and hygiene. Low-dose atropine can cause mild light sensitivity or blurred near vision in some children, usually well tolerated at the low doses used for myopia control. We discuss the specific risks and how we manage them for whichever treatment is recommended.
Can different treatments be used on each eye?
In specific circumstances, yes, for example if the two eyes have quite different prescriptions or respond differently to a treatment. This isn't the default approach, but it's a genuine option we'll discuss if it suits your child's situation.
Does a more expensive treatment mean better myopia control?
Not necessarily. Cost reflects the technology and lens design involved, not a direct ranking of effectiveness. Several of the most effective, best-evidenced options sit at different price points, so we base recommendations on evidence and fit for your child, not price.
How soon will we know if a treatment is working for my child?
Meaningful trends usually take at least six to twelve months of axial length tracking to interpret confidently, since normal eye growth has some natural variation visit to visit. We wouldn't judge a treatment as ineffective from a single review.

Find The Right Treatment For Your Child

Book a comprehensive myopia assessment and we'll talk through which evidence-based options genuinely suit your child's age, prescription and lifestyle.

Book an Appointment